About the Journal

Scope

The Metakognisi Journal is published by Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Babunnajah Pandeglang. The journal was first issued in print in 2019 with the ISSN number 2655-9358, and in 2021, it began publishing an online version with the ISSN number 2798-0774. The scope of the Metakognisi Journal focuses on the field of Education, which includes Early Childhood Education, Basic Education, Mathematics Education, English Language Education, Sports Education, Computer Education, and Islamic Education. The Metakognisi Journal currently has the DOI prefix 10.57121. Metakognisi is committed to publishing quality articles in both Indonesian and English that can serve as references and resource materials for researchers, especially in the field of Education. 

Review Process

In the review process, Jurnal Metakognisi (Metacognition Journal) involves authors, editor-in-chief, editors, and reviewers. In the review process, Jurnal Metakognisi applies the Double-Blind Review model (as much as possible the editorial team tries to ensure that the reviewer does not know the identity of the author of the manuscript being reviewed/examined, the author's identity is hidden by the editorial team), to maintain confidentiality. Each submitted manuscript is first checked by the editor-in-chief and editor. If the manuscript meets the focus and scope as well as the writing guidelines of Jurnal Metakognisi, the document is forwarded to the reviewer to assess the content and novelty of the manuscript. If not, the manuscript will be returned to the author. At least two reviewers will review each document for approximately 1-3 weeks with the predetermined and agreed-upon manuscript evaluation criteria. Manuscripts that have been submitted require an average time of about two months to be published.

Publication Ethics Guidelines

Jurnal Metakognisi (Metacognition Journal) is published by the Babunnajah Pandeglang College of Teacher Training and Education. The journal was first published in print version in 2019 with ISSN number 2655-9358, and in 2021 the journal launched an online version with ISSN number 2798-0774. Jurnal Metakognisi is committed to publishing quality articles in Indonesian language that can be used as references and reading materials for researchers, especially in the field of Education. As a scientific publication platform, Metacognition is committed to upholding publication ethics that prioritize the scholarly aspects of the writings and taking all possible actions against errors in the publication process. Authors submit articles accompanied by a statement of originality, stating that the writing is their own work and has not been previously published in other journals. The Editorial Team, including the Editor-in-Chief, assigns editors to examine the scholarly merit of the writings and match them with the writing guidelines (template). Furthermore, the editor assigns reviewers to review the manuscripts submitted by the authors.

Article Publication Decision

The Metacognition Editorial Team is responsible for deciding which manuscripts are eligible and should be published. The Editor-in-Chief can be guided by the journal's editorial board policies and limited by the legal requirements applicable to Jurnal Metakognisi regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may consult with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Manuscript Review

The Editorial Team must ensure that every manuscript submitted to Jurnal Metakognisi is first evaluated by the editor, using appropriate standard software. The examination is done to check the originality of the manuscript content, and after passing this test, the manuscript is forwarded to the two reviewers for a blind peer review, and each will make a recommendation to publish the manuscript in its form according to the writing guidelines (template) or reject it. The time required for each review stage is at least one month after the reviewer has stated their willingness. Each article has a different review stage. If an article is of very good or very poor quality, it may be possible to get a decision faster.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Information or ideas obtained through the review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers must not consider manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest arising from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or connections with the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

Fairness

Manuscripts should be evaluated solely based on their scholarly merit and content without regard to the authors' race, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

The Editorial Team, from the Editor-in-Chief, editors, and administrative staff, must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.

Reviewer Duties

Promptness

If a reviewer feels unable to complete the review of a manuscript within the stipulated time, they should communicate this to the editor so that the manuscript can be sent to another reviewer.

Confidentiality

Information about manuscripts submitted by authors must be kept confidential and treated as privileged information.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. There should be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should review manuscripts that will be reviewed starting from relevant sources and aspects of originality, and any cited sources must be relevant to the theme of the manuscript. Reviewers should also call the Editorial Team's attention to any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers they are aware of.

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must not review manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or connections with the authors, or any institutions associated with the manuscript.

Author Duties

Reporting Standards

Authors of original research reports should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in relation to a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this must be appropriately cited.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have influenced the nature of the reported work.

Errors in Published Works

When authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work, it is the authors' obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript.